CodeFix

Find context rot before another AI patch makes it worse

CodeFix identifies where repeated AI edits drifted from the intended architecture, product spec, and launch-critical flows.

acme/ai-marketplaceCodeFix evidence ready
main · 84 files mapped · spec coverage compared · no source stored
Repo map84 files
1Ingest
2Map
3Risk
4Proof
5Verdict
Evidence streamLive
PAY
Stripe webhook retries can leave paid users unentitledapp/api/stripe/webhook/route.ts
AUTH
Admin route lacks role guard on write pathapp/admin/projects/[id]/route.ts
SPEC
7 promised flows are not backed by tests or handlersspec coverage compare
SHIP
Missing production env validation before deploylib/systemReadiness.ts
Detailed proof02:41
Launch Readiness62/100
Security RiskHigh
Missing Features7
Production Blockers5

Highest leverage finding

Payment state can drift from app state

Checkout can succeed while booking and entitlement records remain incomplete after webhook retries.

$4,500 to $7,500
app/api/stripe/webhook/route.tssupabase/policies.sqltests/checkout.spec.ts
Next: make webhook persistence idempotent, add paid-state recovery, then re-scan.

Context rot signals

CodeFix separates symptoms from launch blockers.

Duplicate logic appears across generated files.

The spec and UI drift apart.

State, auth, or payment assumptions are now inconsistent.

What you get

A report that explains the risk and the next safe patch boundary.

Each finding has a plain-English founder summary plus technical evidence with affected files, recommended fixes, acceptance criteria, and regression cautions.

Duplicate logic signals
Spec drift map
Affected files
Safe repair order

Sample findings

The output is specific enough to scope repair work.

Two booking flows now write different shapes to the same table.

A newer component bypasses the original permission helper.

Trust FAQ

Clear access boundaries before code is uploaded.

Do you support private repos?

Yes. CodeFix supports private GitHub repositories and ZIP exports. Repository access is used only to inspect the code needed for launch-readiness analysis.

Do you train models on my code?

No. Customer code is analyzed for the report and is not used for model training. Deeper proof runs through configured live analysis.

Can I delete my project?

Yes. Projects are built around delete-after-report controls and revocable access so uploaded code does not need to remain in the system longer than necessary.

What access do you need?

CodeFix needs source access or a ZIP export, plus any spec, PRD, screenshots, or notes that explain what the app should do and what is currently failing.

Launch-readiness report

Get the proof-to-ship plan before the next rebuild debate

Upload the repo and spec. Get the gaps, risks, repair scope, and repair-budget estimate before the next sprint decision.

Analyze my app
Context Rot | CodeFix