The model loses codebase context and fixes the first almost-plausible symptom.
CodeFix
Stop the repair loop before another AI patch creates a new regression
CodeFix finds the root cause, affected files, hidden dependencies, blast radius, and the smallest safe repair path so your coding tool gets real codebase context instead of another vague prompt.
main · 84 files mapped · spec coverage compared · no source stored
Repo map84 files
1Ingest
2Map
3Risk
4Proof
5Verdict
Evidence streamLive
PAY
Stripe webhook retries can leave paid users unentitledapp/api/stripe/webhook/route.ts
AUTH
Admin route lacks role guard on write pathapp/admin/projects/[id]/route.ts
SPEC
7 promised flows are not backed by tests or handlersspec coverage compare
SHIP
Missing production env validation before deploylib/systemReadiness.ts
Detailed proof02:41
Launch Readiness62/100
Security RiskHigh
Missing Features7
Production Blockers5
Highest leverage finding
Payment state can drift from app state
Checkout can succeed while booking and entitlement records remain incomplete after webhook retries.
$4,500 to $7,500
app/api/stripe/webhook/route.tssupabase/policies.sqltests/checkout.spec.tsNext: make webhook persistence idempotent, add paid-state recovery, then re-scan.
Why prompt loops happen
CodeFix separates symptoms from launch blockers.
Hidden dependencies are missed until a regression appears somewhere else.
Acceptance criteria and file boundaries are too vague for safe patching.
What you get
A report that explains the risk and the next safe patch boundary.
Each finding has a plain-English founder summary plus technical evidence with affected files, recommended fixes, acceptance criteria, and regression cautions.
Root cause vs symptom separation
Implementation briefs for coding tools
Regression cautions
Patch boundaries with affected files
Sample findings
The output is specific enough to scope repair work.
The recurring bug is triggered by a shared state helper, not the component Cursor keeps editing.
A broad prompt is touching route, data, and UI files in one pass.
The fix needs one acceptance test before asking the AI tool to patch.
Trust FAQ
Clear access boundaries before code is uploaded.
Do you support private repos?
Yes. CodeFix supports private GitHub repositories and ZIP exports. Repository access is used only to inspect the code needed for launch-readiness analysis.
Do you train models on my code?
No. Customer code is analyzed for the report and is not used for model training. Deeper proof runs through configured live analysis.
Can I delete my project?
Yes. Projects are built around delete-after-report controls and revocable access so uploaded code does not need to remain in the system longer than necessary.
What access do you need?
CodeFix needs source access or a ZIP export, plus any spec, PRD, screenshots, or notes that explain what the app should do and what is currently failing.
Launch-readiness report
Get the proof-to-ship plan before the next rebuild debate
Upload the repo and spec. Get the gaps, risks, repair scope, and repair-budget estimate before the next sprint decision.