Schema and UI assumptions do not match.
CodeFix
Check Lovable plus Supabase apps for launch-risk gaps
CodeFix reviews generated Lovable flows against Supabase auth, RLS, schema, admin, and deployment requirements.
Highest leverage finding
Payment state can drift from app state
Checkout can succeed while booking and entitlement records remain incomplete after webhook retries.
app/api/stripe/webhook/route.tssupabase/policies.sqltests/checkout.spec.tsLovable plus Supabase blockers
CodeFix separates symptoms from launch blockers.
Preview auth differs from production behavior.
RLS policies do not cover generated flows.
What you get
A report that explains the risk and the next safe patch boundary.
Each finding has a plain-English founder summary plus technical evidence with affected files, recommended fixes, acceptance criteria, and regression cautions.
Sample findings
The output is specific enough to scope repair work.
The UI assumes an approval status field that is not enforced in policy.
Admin edits bypass the intended role model.
Trust FAQ
Clear access boundaries before code is uploaded.
Do you support private repos?
Yes. CodeFix supports private GitHub repositories and ZIP exports. Repository access is used only to inspect the code needed for launch-readiness analysis.
Do you train models on my code?
No. Customer code is analyzed for the report and is not used for model training. Deeper proof runs through configured live analysis.
Can I delete my project?
Yes. Projects are built around delete-after-report controls and revocable access so uploaded code does not need to remain in the system longer than necessary.
What access do you need?
CodeFix needs source access or a ZIP export, plus any spec, PRD, screenshots, or notes that explain what the app should do and what is currently failing.
Launch-readiness report
Get the proof-to-ship plan before the next rebuild debate
Upload the repo and spec. Get the gaps, risks, repair scope, and repair-budget estimate before the next sprint decision.